Delivering on the Technicalities of Credible Elections in Nigeria: Issues, Thought Processes, and Solutions
By Professor Ojo Emmanuel Ademola
As Nigeria enters yet another election cycle, the perennial question resurfaces: how do we deliver elections that are not only free and fair but also technically credible? The credibility of elections is not a mere aspiration; it is the bedrock of democratic legitimacy. Without credible elections, governance becomes contested, institutions weakened, and citizens disillusioned. To address this, we must interrogate the technicalities underpinning electoral credibility, the issues that persist, the thought processes guiding reform, and the solutions that can transform Nigeria’s democratic experience.
READ ALSO: The Prisoner the Justice System Forgot: A Life Lost to a Single Childhood Mistake
The Technicalities of Credible Elections: Lessons from Established Democracies
Credible elections are not achieved by rhetoric but by systems, processes, and technologies that guarantee transparency, inclusivity, and accountability. In Nigeria, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has introduced innovations such as the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV). These tools are designed to ensure that voter accreditation is genuine and that results are transmitted transparently. Yet, technology alone does not guarantee credibility. In countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Germany, electoral credibility is anchored in accurate voter registers, secure accreditation processes, transparent collation of results, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms. Nigeria must emulate these standards by ensuring that its voter register is clean and comprehensive, that accreditation is secure, that collation is transparent with clear audit trails, and that electoral justice is timely and impartial. These technicalities are not abstract; they are practical mechanisms that determine whether citizens trust the process.
Persistent Issues Undermining Credibility: Contrasts with the Global North
Despite reforms, Nigeria’s elections continue to face challenges that compromise credibility. The voter register remains flawed, with multiple registrations, underage voters, and incomplete data persisting. Logistical failures are common, with late arrival of materials, malfunctioning devices, and poorly trained officials undermining confidence. Security concerns are endemic, as violence, intimidation, and ballot snatching mar the electoral environment in certain regions. Result transmission gaps also persist, with delays or inconsistencies in uploading results fuelling suspicion and eroding trust. Judicial bottlenecks compound these problems, as protracted litigation over election petitions undermines confidence in the finality of outcomes. By contrast, democracies in the Global North have largely overcome such systemic weaknesses through institutional resilience, professionalised electoral management, and strong legal frameworks. Nigeria must confront these persistent issues if it is to achieve comparable credibility.
Thought Processes Guiding Reform: Borrowing from Global Practices
To deliver credible elections, Nigeria must adopt a holistic thought process that integrates technology, institutional capacity, and civic responsibility. This requires systems thinking, where elections are viewed as interconnected processes rather than isolated events. It demands risk management, with logistical, technical, and security risks anticipated and contingencies prepared. Stakeholder inclusivity is essential, with political parties, civil society, media, and citizens engaged in electoral planning and oversight. Continuous improvement must be institutionalised, with lessons from past cycles embedded into reforms. In democracies such as Sweden or New Zealand, electoral reform is guided by these principles, ensuring that elections are not merely about winners and losers but about sustaining democratic legitimacy. Nigeria must adopt similar thought processes to strengthen its democratic foundations.
Solutions for Delivering Credible Elections: Global Comparisons
Strengthening the voter register is paramount. INEC must invest in biometric verification, cross-checking with national databases, and periodic audits, as seen in countries like Estonia, which has pioneered secure digital voter identification. Enhancing logistics and training is equally vital. Election materials must arrive on time, and officials must be adequately trained, as is standard practice in Canada, where electoral staff undergo rigorous preparation. Securing the electoral environment is another priority. Security agencies must adopt a non-partisan posture, protecting voters and officials rather than intimidating them. Transparent result management is indispensable. BVAS and IReV must be fully operational, with backup systems to prevent failure. Real-time publication of results enhances transparency and reduces speculation, echoing practices in Germany where results are swiftly and openly reported. Reforming electoral justice is also critical. Election petitions must be resolved swiftly, ideally before swearing-in ceremonies, as is the case in many European democracies where electoral disputes are settled within weeks. Finally, civic education and engagement must be continuous. Citizens must understand their rights and responsibilities, as demonstrated in Australia, where civic education is embedded in the school curriculum and public discourse.
The Role of Technology: Hybrid Approaches Across Democracies
Technology is a double-edged sword. While it can enhance transparency, it can also be manipulated or fail. Nigeria must therefore adopt a hybrid approach: leveraging technology while maintaining manual safeguards. For instance, while BVAS ensures biometric accreditation, physical voter registers should remain available for cross-verification. Similarly, while IReV allows online result viewing, physical collation centres must remain open to observers. Countries such as India and the United States illustrate this hybrid approach, combining technological innovation with manual checks to ensure resilience. Nigeria must learn from these experiences to prevent failures from compromising credibility.
Institutional Capacity and Independence: Global Standards
INEC’s independence is paramount. Political interference undermines credibility. Adequate funding, professional staffing, and legal protection are essential. Moreover, collaboration with civil society and international partners can strengthen oversight and build trust. In democracies such as the United Kingdom, electoral commissions are insulated from political pressure, ensuring impartiality. Nigeria must strengthen its institutions to meet similar standards, ensuring that integrity and capacity are continuously reinforced.
Citizens as Custodians of Credibility: A Universal Principle
Ultimately, credible elections are not delivered by institutions alone but by citizens. Voters must resist inducement, report irregularities, and participate actively. Civil society must monitor, document, and advocate for transparency. The media must report responsibly, avoiding sensationalism and misinformation. Together, these actors form the ecosystem of electoral credibility. Citizens are not passive participants; they are custodians of democracy, and their vigilance is indispensable. This principle is universal, evident in democracies from Finland to South Africa, where citizen engagement sustains electoral integrity.
Nigeria must embrace this ethos to consolidate its democracy. Yet beyond individual vigilance, there is a pressing need for election champions and ambassadors—respected figures within communities who embody democratic values and inspire collective responsibility. In many democracies of the Global North, such as Canada and Germany, civic ambassadors play a vital role in mobilising citizens, educating them on electoral processes, and reinforcing the culture of participation. Nigeria can benefit from cultivating similar champions: teachers, religious leaders, youth advocates, and community organisers who act as trusted voices, encouraging transparency and discouraging malpractice. These election ambassadors would serve as bridges between institutions and citizens, amplifying trust and ensuring that the spirit of democracy is not confined to polling stations but permeates everyday civic life. By nurturing such champions, Nigeria can strengthen the moral and social fabric that underpins credible elections, ensuring that democracy is not only protected by laws and institutions but also actively defended by its people.
Conclusion: Towards Democratic Legitimacy
Nigeria’s democratic journey is marked by progress and setbacks. Each election cycle offers an opportunity to deepen credibility. Delivering on the technicalities of credible elections requires confronting persistent issues, adopting holistic thought processes, and implementing practical solutions. It demands that institutions act with integrity, technology be deployed effectively, and citizens embrace their role as custodians of democracy. As another election cycle beckons, Nigeria must rise to the challenge. Credible elections are not optional; they are the lifeblood of democracy. Without them, governance falters, legitimacy wanes, and the social contract collapses. With them, Nigeria can consolidate democracy, inspire confidence, and chart a path towards sustainable development.
Professor Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is rhe First African Professor of Cybersecurity and Information Technology Management, Global Education Advocate, Chartered Manager, UK Digital Journalist, Strategic Advisor & Prophetic Mobiliser for National Transformation, public intellectual, and African governance thinker and General Evangelist of CAC Nigeria and Overseas