Self-Determination Recognised in International Law, But Nigerian Constitution Prevails — Court on Nnamdi Kanu
A Nigerian court has ruled that while the concept of self-determination is recognised under international law, it does not supersede the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution in the case involving the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.
Delivering the judgment, the court noted that international conventions acknowledge the right of any group to seek self-determination peacefully. However, it stressed that such rights must be exercised within the limits of the country’s domestic laws, which remain supreme.
The court explained that although Kanu’s arguments referenced international treaties on the rights of indigenous peoples and political groups, these instruments cannot override the Nigerian Constitution unless they have been specifically domesticated by the National Assembly.
It added that Nigeria, as a sovereign nation, is guided primarily by its constitution, which outlines the procedures for political expression, civil movements, and changes to the structure of the state.
ALSO READ: Amitabh Bachchan: The Legend Who Redefined Indian Cinema
The ruling clarifies the legal standing of Kanu’s long-standing claim that his agitation for a Biafran state is protected under international law. According to the court, “Self-determination is indeed a recognised principle globally, but any agitation must operate within the framework of Nigeria’s constitutional order.”
The judgment is expected to spark further debate among legal analysts, rights activists, and supporters of the IPOB leader, who has continued to push for freedom and a separate state for his people.
Kanu’s legal team is reportedly reviewing the ruling to determine their next line of action.
Self-Determination Recognised in International Law, But Nigerian Constitution Prevails — Court on Nnamdi Kanu