IPOB: Nnamdi Kanu was legally re-arrested- Malami
IPOB: Nnamdi Kanu was legally re-arrested- Malami
By Auwal Ilyasu
The Federal Government on Wednesday maintained that it applied due process in the extradition of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.
Read Also: Breaking: Rev. Zango regains freedom from Boko Haram
The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN who made the clarification in response to negative insinuations, disclosed that a bench warrant against Kanu was judiciously procured by the government from the court where Kanu jumped bail.
Malami who was responding to views attributed to one Kelechi Madu, described it as outrageously ignoramus opinions that are eccentric and weird to the legal profession.
This was contained in a statement by the Special Assistant to the AGF on Media and Public Relations, Dr. Umar Gwandu.
According to the statement: “it is unfortunate for someone who claims to be a lawyer of a status of a Solicitor General of a provincial State of Alberta in Canada to fault the internationally recognized manner through which Nnamdi Kanu who jumped bail was re-arrested and brought back to face trial.
It was abundantly clear that a bench warrant was lawfully and judiciously procured through judicial process by a competent court of law, whose bail condition Nnamdi Kanu breached with impunity. There was no illegality in the entire process and the question of illegality does not even arise.
It is a common principle of the law that he who comes to equity must come with clean hands.
The self-acclaimed leader of the proscribed group of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has enjoyed representation by counsel of his choice all through the judicial process and was never denied a right of choice of counsel or recourse to one, even when he symbolizes a proscribed association (IPOB) in law, and in fact, his association has been legally proscribed.
Where was the so-called Madu when Nnamdi Kanu was inciting violence against the country? Why, as a lawyer, would Madu support a fugitive who jumped bail and accused of terrorism and a treasonable felony? What stopped Madu from voicing out dissent on the atrocities of Kanu and their group.
It is important to educate the likes of Keleche Madu that both Nigeria (his country of birth) and Canada (where he claims to be practicing law) are signatories to the Multinational Treaty Agreement where, among others, fugitive fleeing justice in nations with the similar agreement could be brought back to face justice.
It is a pity that as a Solicitor General of a province, Madu failed to keep himself acquainted with the provisions of general laws of the country where he stays as well as international laws.
We wish to draw the attention of Madu to the provisions of the Consolidated Act Criminal Code under the Canadian Law R.S., C 1985, c. C-46:1-2 on Treason and other Offences vis:
46(1) Everyone commits high treason who, in Canada: (a) Kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her, (b) Levels war against Canada or does any act thereto; or (C) Assist an enemy at war with Canada or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
46(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada; “(a) Use force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province, (b) Without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety of defense of Canada; (c) Conspires with any person to commit high treason or do anything mentioned in paragraph (a); (d ) Forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifest that intention by an overt act; or (e) Conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests intention by and overt act.
The punishments for treason are also stated in the Canadian Laws R.S.C. 1985, c. C-47:1-4.
As the saying goes “an empty vessel makes the loudest noise”. We advise the so-called “learned man” to shelve his arrogance and learn to study the law books before opening his mouth to disgrace himself before the right-thinking members of the society thereby attracting to himself criticism that may propel doubt about his suitability for the job he claims to be doing now, after moving out of his country of origin in which he fails to excel.
IPOB: Nnamdi Kanu was legally re-arrested- Malami
